|
|
ADD TO FAVORITES |
| HOME . SITE MAP . ARTISTS . STYLES . SHORTCUTS . MONOGRAPHS . CANON . SCHOOLS . MUSEUMS/GALLERIES . COURSES/WORKSHOPS . MOVIES . CONTACT | |
Watching the architecture of the '60s one have to remember that it was a decade of the New Left, the pantheon 3xM (Marx, Marcuse, Mao), the era of hippies and Woodstock. The symbols of the times were pacifism, Black Panthers, the revolution of manners, pop-art, anti-art, counter-culture and the Paris event in May 1968 - one word - full dismantling of the structures of wealth-society. |
|
Architecture and aesthetic problems faded into the background. Classics of Modernism (Le Corbusier, Niemeyer, Costa) made his mad visions of urban design (no longer accepted in Europe and America) in India and Brazil.
The last CIAM congress was organized in Otterloo (1959) by the so-called Team X - a group of rebels contesting assumptions of the Athens Charter. Team X split into two groups with different preferences. British group gathered around Alison and Peter Smithson focused on architectural issues and contributed to the spread of brutalism. Dutch group centered around Aldo van Eyck and Jacob Bakema devoted to new urbanism and gave the beginnings of structuralism. |
Structuralists have created two distinct aesthetics: - in 1959, Aldo van Eyck created a so-called "aesthetics of numbers" also known as spatial systems architecture, which treats the structure of buildings as a system of living cells. Examples of this idea are: Amsterdam Orphanage by van Eyck (1960), in which dividing cells are growing in any direction, and "Cubic Houses" in Rotterdam, designed in 1984 by a disciple of van Eyck, Piet Blom.
|
While the project of van Eyck is the realization of idea related to reality, so Blom's project is an example of extreme architectural imbecility combined with complete contempt for the future users of these buildings. I bet, Blomit would make a better project for rabbit hutches. Such a project can not be assessed in terms of architecture, and the responsibility for this achievement borne in equal parts designer and his teacher. - In 1961 John Habraken formulated the basis of "architecture of joyful diversity", also known by the term "structure and chance". This concept assumed the participation of citizens in defining the principles of building, so it is called the "participatory architecture". Expo'67 in Montreal was devoted to the problems of housing. Habitat, housing complex designed for this exhibition by Israeli architect Moshe Safdie, is a practical realization of structuralist concepts.
< Moshe Safdie, Habitat, Montreal, 1967 /below the panorama of the entire complex/ |
|
|
In 1961, Robert Rauschenberg sent to the gallery Iris Clert (that issued the (closed) tin of sardines as a work of art) the telegram reads as follows: "This is a portrait of Iris Clert, because I said so. " |
A special place in the history of structuralism takes metabolism, named after a group of Japanese architects working under the direction of Kenzo Tange. In 1960, Tange presented the plan to build a new neighborhood on artificial islands and the footbridge stretched over the bay near Tokyo. The plan resembles a tree trunk from which branches sprout leaves covered with residential buildings - and this is the essence of metabolism, binding individual living spaces with the "bloodstream" of infrastructure and communications.
The same concept was realized in one of the few metabolic buildings - Nagakin skyscraper in Tokyo (Kisho Kurokawa, 1972), in which the capsule housing are attached to the stem of the building as a Brussels sprouts. These self-contained steel capsule can be mounted to the supporting structure in a way that enables them to exchange and move, and therefore almost any conversion of the building. This is consistent with the Buddhist vision of continuous volatility of the world. Another design presented at the Expo-67 gave rise to awe the audience and futuristic Utopian hopes. It was the Montreal Biosphere, designed by Buckminster Fuller, who developed and implemented the concept of geodesic domes designed by German engineer Walther Bauersfeld. This ideal, geometric form has become synonymous with universe, a symbol of Earth and inspired eco-architect, who has repeatedly tried to create visions of the environment independent of the vagaries of climate. These visions were not realized, but the Biosphere has become a symbol of modern architecture, and its example is the roof of the Golden Terraces next to Warsaw Central Station.
|
| Jeśli architektura jest Sztuką, to na początku lat siedemdziesiątych architekci znaleźli się w sytuacji wręcz rozpaczliwej. Klasycy modernizmu odeszli pozostawiając wielkie dzieła, nie rozwiązane problemy i poddawane wprawdzie wielokrotnie w wątpliwość, ale chyba autentyczne poczucie misji i odpowiedzialności za losy świata. W latach 70-tych okazało się, że wszystko jest dozwolone, technika zrealizuje każdy, nawet najtrudniejszy problem budowlany i konstrukcyjny, budować trzeba dużo i szybko - tylko nie wiadomo jak. Artyści innych dziedzin sztuki mogli uprawiać konceptualizm, pop-art, powielać twarze Marilyn Monroe lub krowie pyski, przyczepiać do szklanek kartki czyniące z wody drzewo a z ludzi barany, mogli to robić dla zgrywy lub z rozpaczy (oni też czuli, że czasy Leonardów się skończyły), mogli wierzyć w sens tego co robią albo cynicznie drwić z urabianej przez krytykę publiczności, ale architekci wyszli z innej szkoły. Nawet najbardziej obrazoburcze teorie i projekty architektów nigdy nie podważały sensu istnienia architektury tak, jak od kilkudziesięciu już lat sens sztuk czystych podważali dadaiści i ich następcy. Poza tym architekci wiedzieli, że ich dzieła pochłoną miliardy (dolarów) i będą stać przynajmniej przez dziesięciolecia głosząc ich chwałę lub hańbę (zawodową). Budynku nie można wystawić w niszowej galerii, do której zaprasza się wąskie grono "dojrzałych" odbiorców. Architekturę widzi i ocenia każdy. Właśnie z powodu pewnej tradycji zawodowej (dzisiaj powiedzielibyśmy - etosu) pokolenie architektów czynnych na początku lat 70-tych potrzebowało dużo czasu, aby przyznać się do bezradności i zrobić to w sposób wyrafinowany i elegancki. Zanim do tego doszło powstawały dzieła nienaganne technicznie i nijakie. Oto kilka najsłynniejszych budowli lat 70-tych XX wieku. |
|
![]() Skidmore/Owings/Merrill, John Hancock Center, 1970 |
![]() Minoru Yamasaki, World Trade Center, Nowy York, 1973 |
![]() Euston Tower, Londyn, 1970 |
![]() Shakespeare Tower (Barbican Estate), Londyn, 1976 |
![]() KEMA Toren, Arnhem, Holandia, 1970 |
![]() ![]() Alvar Aalto, Mount Angel Abbey Library, Mt. Angel, Oregon, 1970 |
![]() Trust Bank Building, Johannesburg, 1970 |
![]() Skidmore/Owings/Merrill, Sears Tower, Chicago, 1973 |
William L. Pereira, Transamerica Pyramid, San Francisco, 1972 |
![]() Seoul Tower, 1975 |
![]() John Andrews, CN Tower, Toronto, 1976 |
![]() ![]() Rothko/Johnson, Rothko Chapel, Houston, 1971 |
PRUITT-IGOE - THE END OF MODERNISM
A formal impasse of modern architecture was not a quintessential problem. This problem was the city as a whole, and the failure of modernist urban planning concepts contained in the Athens Charter of CIAM.
Despite the reasonable assumptions and incomparably better housing conditions than in the surrounding complex of old buildings, Pruit Igoe changed over several years in slums devastated by youth gangs, most residents simply fled, and the whole complex was demolished in 1972.
Pruitt-Igoe decommissioning in 1972, is considered the symbolic end of modernist urban planning and the era of CIAM. It was the result of an process ongoing for a long time. |
|
The essence of modernism (defined as an international style) based on the fact that the glorifying function of rejected all tradition identified with the different varieties of historicism. In general, we know the ancient architectural monuments, but actually we do not know how the ordinary Greek or Roman lived. Ancient Rome, and even gothic or renaissance cities were filled with tacky, flammable buildings, fires and collapsing buildings were on the agenda. In the nineteenth-century Paris, a dozen people lived in one room and in Warsaw to the time of Lindley, sewage flowed along ditches street. Architectural modernism was born at a time when monumental colonnades were replaced by a convulsive Nouveau ornamentation, futurism broke off from all tradition, and the architecture has become an insoluble problem of mass housing. Four empires lay in ruins after World War I, and Russia, Germany and Hungary experienced a communist revolution. The development of modernism in architecture has had its delays due to the nature of the investment process. Gropius designed the Bauhaus buildings in the period when most of the revolutionary style of painting had been forgotten. Mies van der Rohe built the Farnsworth House, Lake Shore Drive and Crown Hall at a time when Jackson Pollock's celebrated short triumph, and soon the scene entered generation of figurative expressionist and anti-pop-art artists. Modernist architecture developed its own hermetic language when modernism was already a historical phenomenon. When other streams quietly engaged in their own development by focusing on "building ", the modernists of the Bauhaus school and Le Corbusier, as the heirs of nineteenth-century and co-founder of twentieth-century social utopias, attempt to resolve the problem of mass industrialized housing. The fact that the modernists could not find the correct solution does not mean, that the problem does not exist. |
The real problem od modern architekture and the reason for its defeat lay in the fact that even eminent architekcts sacralized th function, but they brought it to the level of pure biology. |
LAS VEGAS AND THE BIRTH OF POSTMODERNISM
![]() Las Vegas, Hotel New York New York, 1997 |
|
In 1972 Robert Venturi, Denise Scott and Steven Izenour wrote a book "Learning from Las Vegas". The book has been translated into 18 languages and had a huge impact on the emergence of postmodernism. The book analyzes the buildings of Las Vegas and illustrate two main points (Strip was under construction since 1946). The first part says that the architecture in addition to its purely utility function serves as a sort of relay or a mirror reflecting the message understandable to the people of the community. In this sense, architecture "says". The role of such a relay can satisfy ornament and the repetitive, formal style attributes. Decoding these characters allows the observer "embed" building in our consciousness, to identify with him, and with all those who understand this language. In large part this is a replay of thought from the book "Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture". In the second part, which is an attempt to find a cure for the sterility of modernism, Venturi creates so-called theory of "decorated shed". It says that a purpose of any building shall not conclude on the basis of its actual function, but on the basis of its external appearance. This decoration (and not the function) prejudge of what the building is for the observer. The effects of disharmony between function and decoration are frequent instances of churches that look like a factory, and factories that look like a church. Summing up the conclusions of the Venturi's both books, we can conclude that it is a hymn to the unholy (by Loos) ornament and rehabilitation of historic architectural styles. These styles, however, must be subjected to specific treatment, because it's not just a return to historicism, but the freedom to draw on the achievements of the past in order to juggling the elements to create something that is new value in architecture - a new context and ironic fun. Disharmony between the function of the building and its appearance is, in terms of traditional architectural education, the fundamental error in design. This error, however, ceases to be a mistake, and grows up to one of the basic stylistic tricks. You can even risk saying that the greater the disharmony, the wider context and so much more fun - not to mention the almost apocalyptic irony. Contextual and ironic eclecticism are distinguishing features of postmodernism, and Venturi was the first priest. ![]() Las Vegas, Hotel Paris, 1999 It is difficult to understand how an intelligent man and an experienced architect could formulate such a theory (that little problem) and distribute it as a prescription for a mental vacuum left by the classics of modernism (this is already a big problem.)
|
![]() Las Vegas, Hotel MGM, arch. Veldon Simpson, 1993 |
|
Famous hotels in Las Vegas was built in the 90's of the twentieth century, but the first fully mature work of the postmodern - Piazza d'Italia - was designed and completed by Charles Moore in New Orlean in 1979... and the first works that belong to postmodernism arose in the 30s of the twentieth century. |
![]() Charles Moore, Piazza d'Italia, New Orlean, 1979 |
![]() |
1926 Peder Vilhelm Jensen-Klint Grundtvigs Kirke Kopenhaga |
![]() |
1937 Guðjón Samúelsson Hallgrmskirkja Church Islandia |
![]() |
1972 William Pereira Transamerica Pyramid San Francisco |
![]() |
1973
|
![]() |
1974 Paolo Portoghesi Centralny meczet Rzym |
![]() |
1978 Ricardo Bofill Antigone Esplanade Montpellier |
![]() |
1982 Hans Hollein Abteiberg Museum Mönchengladbach |
![]() |
1982 Michael Graves Humana Building Louisville |
![]() |
1982 Michale Graves Portland Public Service Building |
![]() |
1983 Phillip Johnson/John Burgee Bank of America Center Houston |
![]() |
1983 Philip Johnson One PPG Place Pittsburgh |
![]() |
1984 |
![]() |
1984 Philip Johnson/John Burgee Sony Tower Nowy York |
![]() |
1987 Stirling Clore Gallery Londyn |
![]() |
1987 Jones/Kirkland Mississauga Civic Centre Montreal |
![]() |
1989 César Pelli Wells Fargo Center Minneapolis |
![]() |
1990 Terry Farrell SIS building Vauxhall Cross, Londyn |
![]() |
1990 Hans Hollein Haas-Haus Wiedeń |
![]() |
1990 Ricardo Legorreta Children's Discovery Museum San Jose, California |
![]() |
1990 |
![]() |
1991 Hans Holein Museum fuer Moderne Kunst Framkfurt/Main |
![]() |
1991 Kengo Kuma M2 Building Setagaya, Tokyo |
![]() |
1991 Venturi/Scott Brown National Gallery Londyn |
![]() |
1991 Helmut Jahn Messeturm Frankfurt |
![]() |
1991 Hammond/Beeby/Babka Harold Washington Library Chicago |
![]() |
1992 Antoine Predock Classroom & Laboratory Building Pomona |
![]() |
1992 |
![]() |
1993 John Burgee/Philip Johnson Comerica Tower Detroit |
![]() |
1994 |
![]() |
1994 Aldo Rossi Bonnefanten Museum Maastricht |
![]() |
1994 Ricardo Legorreta Metropolitan Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception Managua |
![]() |
1995 Ricardo Legorreta San Antonio Public Library Texas |
![]() |
1995 |
![]() |
1995 |
![]() |
1996 Mario Botta Cymbalista Synagogue Jewish Heritage Center Tel Aviv |
![]() |
1996 Ricardo Bofill Teatre Nacional de Catalunya Barcelona |
![]() |
1996 Philip Johnson Gate of Europe Madryt |
![]() |
1997 |
![]() |
1997 Michael Graves Steigenberger Hotel El Gouna, Egypt |
![]() |
1998 Santiago Calatrava City of the Arts and Sciences Valencia |
![]() |
1998 César Pelli Petronas Twin Towers Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
![]() |
1998 James Stirling/Michael Wilford No 1 Poultry Londyn |
![]() |
2000 Michael Wilford Ambasada brytyjska Berlin |
![]() |
2001 Wafi City Mall Dubai |
![]() |
2001 Mario Botta Harting Minden |
![]() |
2001 Santiago Calatrava The Milwaukee Art Museum |
![]() |
2002 |
![]() |
2002 Mária Siklós Hungarian National Theater Budapeszt |
![]() |
2003 Rem Koolhaas The McCormick Tribune Campus Center IIT, Chicago |
![]() |
2003 Steven Holl Simons Hall MIT, Cambridge |
![]() |
2003 Tomás Taveira Leiria Stadium Portugalia |
![]() |
2004 Antoine Predock San Diego Padres Petco Park California |
![]() |
2006 Ricardo Bofill Lazona Plaza Kawasaki, Japan |
![]() |
2006 Mario Botta Casino Campione d’Italia |
![]() |
2008 Ricardo Legorreta Carnegie Mellon University Qatar |
![]() |
2009
|